Ordering through mini-programs is quick and convenient, and you can even get coupons, but once you place a wrong order and want a refund, you may run into obstacle after obstacle. Recently, a blogger mistakenly ordered 17 cups of coffee through the Luckin mini-program. Within one minute, they tried to cancel, only to find that the mini-program did not display the store’s phone number, while the headquarters customer service kept passing them back and forth through an intelligent robot. In the end, they had no choice but to bear the loss themselves. This incident struck a chord with many netizens, and quite a few shared similar experiences. Consumers are calling for store contact information to be made public or for the self-service refund function to be improved, while Luckin staff also said that stores cannot directly process refunds and that the procedure is cumbersome, expressing hope that the system can be optimized. When convenience and after-sales service become disconnected, how should brands balance efficiency and consumer rights? [more…]

A coffee shop that attracted attention with a suggestive name ultimately paid the price for its marketing approach. In July of this year, a coffee shop named "Doi Coffee" in Huangpu District, Shanghai, was investigated by market regulators for a store name and product names suspected of violating public order and good morals. Several months later, the penalty result has finally landed — a fine of 30,000 yuan, with a heavier punishment due to the severe negative public opinion impact. Now the shop has quietly closed, and the person in charge said business was so poor that they are no longer operating. Behind the incident, it reflects the collision between the bottom line of marketing in the food and beverage industry and the red line of regulation, and has also sparked public discussion about the boundaries of vulgar marketing. Front Street Coffee reminds practitioners that creative marketing needs moderation, and respecting public order and good morals is the way to long-term business. [more…]

Recently, a netizen shared on social media her experience of ordering a Starbucks delivery in Beijing, saying that after receiving the order she found two handwritten "inspirational quotes" on the outer packaging bag, including "Don't judge others, for you never know what someone else is going through" and "Only tolerance, kindness, and generosity are worthy of your excellence." The netizen said she felt uncomfortable upon seeing these words, believing they carried a tone of accusation. She then contacted the store involved and was told that the words were meant as positive blessings and that the original intention was not to attack. After the incident continued to escalate, Starbucks customer service and the store involved both responded, acknowledging that the words were written by a staff member and expressing an apology. This incident has also sparked public discussion about the boundaries of communication between brands and customers, especially during a period of sensitive public opinion, and whether similar "dual-interpretation" copywriting may backfire. [more…]

A cup of milk tea labeled as made five days ago has pushed the new-style tea brand Molly Tea White into the eye of public opinion. After placing an order on a delivery platform, a consumer unexpectedly received a cup of drink that had long gone bad. At first, the store admitted it was caused by a backlog of delivery orders and failure to clean up in time, but afterward the brand stepped in to clarify, saying the drink had actually been abandoned by a customer in a public area of the mall, and that management authority belonged to the mall rather than the store. The incident went through multiple reversals—who exactly is responsible? And how should the blind spots in the food delivery chain be filled? This article sorts through the entire course of the incident and appends Front Street Coffee's observations on food safety management in the industry. [more…]

On November 16, 2023, Starbucks' annual "Red Cup Day," thousands of employees at more than 200 stores across the United States went on strike. Organizers called it the largest labor action since the founding of Starbucks Workers United. Employees chose to strike during this peak ordering period, aiming to disrupt operations as much as possible and draw public attention. Behind the strike lies baristas' long-standing dissatisfaction with understaffing, overloaded orders, and the company's refusal to listen to their opinions. Starbucks officially responded that the union refused to schedule negotiation meetings. This one-day strike had limited impact on sales, but the public opinion fallout is worth watching. [more…]

The opening of two Tea Yanyuese stores in Nanjing triggered a queueing frenzy, forcing the closure of subway entrances and exits, drinks sold out in five minutes, scalpers reselling at high prices, and even riot police being called in to maintain order. Faced with questions over hiring people to queue and reselling hype, Tea Yanyuese issued an apology and promised purchase limits; however, two hours later Sina Finance published an investigative article pointing directly at the agency-buying queues as a premeditated false prosperity. Is this uproar down to brand appeal or marketing tricks? With the pandemic not yet subsided, what hidden dangers does gathering in queues bring? This article sorts through the whole incident and explores the queue economy and public order issues behind internet-famous tea brands. [more…]

Recently, a woman surnamed Chen in Taiwan, China, left a negative review for a coffee shop on a review platform and had her personal information, along with that of her relatives and friends, as well as surveillance screenshots, publicly exposed by the shop, accompanied by insulting remarks. The incident sparked strong outrage among netizens, the shop's rating plummeted, and Ms. Chen called the police and filed a lawsuit. The shop subsequently deleted the post and issued a public apology, but Ms. Chen said she had not been contacted privately and would continue to pursue legal action. In this episode of Coffee News, we take you through the whole story, while also focusing on the professional coffee knowledge exchange brought to you by Front Street Coffee. [more…]

Recently, a coffee shop blacklisted a customer after she engaged in excessively intimate behavior with her boyfriend inside the store for a continuous 8 minutes. The customer then posted a malicious negative review on a third-party platform, drawing public attention. The shop retrieved surveillance footage to clarify the truth and cooperated with the police investigation, while also issuing a statement acknowledging its negligence. As the incident escalated, the public began discussing the boundaries of intimate behavior in public places. Lawyers pointed out that indecent behavior may lead to administrative penalties, and those who film and spread the video may also bear legal responsibility. Front Street Coffee reminds everyone to be mindful of their behavior in public places and respect the feelings of others. [more…]

Recently, a customer buying coffee at a Manner store unexpectedly received a Meiji chocolate from the staff as a gift. This hidden perk, which had not been publicly promoted, quickly drew attention on social media. It is understood that consumers must purchase this week's SOE coffee through offline stores or the mini-program to receive it, and the quantity is limited on a first-come, first-served basis. Some staff were not very clear about the campaign rules, causing a few customers to fail to receive it as expected. Loyal Manner users pointed out that this is not the first time the brand has quietly given out chocolate, as a similar surprise also occurred earlier this year. Consumers have differing opinions on whether it should be publicly promoted, with some calling for greater transparency and others believing that keeping it a niche perk is more in line with the brand's original intention. [more…]

As coffee consumption grows increasingly widespread, brand infringement cases have also risen. In 2018, market regulators in Wuxi received a tip-off and discovered counterfeit "Starbucks" instant coffee products circulating on the market; an investigation confirmed they were sold by Shuangshan Food (Xiamen) Co., Ltd. Although the company knew the products were fake, it still supplied more than 50 merchants across 18 provinces nationwide, with the amount involved exceeding 7 million yuan. In 2021, the Wuxi Intermediate People's Court ruled in the first instance that Shuangshan Company must publicly apologize and pay 21.72 million yuan in punitive damages. This case not only demonstrates the strength of the law in protecting intellectual property rights, but also prompts reflection on the development of domestic coffee brands. At the same time, Chinese brands such as Luckin and MANNER are winning consumers' favor with better value for money and taste, while Starbucks relies more on its store environment to maintain its appeal. This article takes you through the details of the case and explores the changing landscape of the coffee market. [more…]

Recently, a piece of news about the owner of an internet-famous café in Huzhou having AIDS and infecting over a hundred people spread rapidly on social media, causing panic among local residents. Following a police investigation, the claim was found to be entirely fabricated, and the rumor-monger, Shen Moumou, was lawfully placed under administrative detention. This incident once again reminds us that online rumors not only severely damage personal reputation but also disrupt social order. Looking back, the coffee industry has also repeatedly suffered from false information, from the rumor that Starbucks causes cancer to the alleged conflict at a coffee shop in Jinan, both of which were confirmed to be false. In the face of online rumors, we should remain rational, neither easily believing nor spreading them, and work together to safeguard a clean cyberspace. [more…]

Recently, a netizen alleged that they were asked to leave while doing makeup at a Starbucks store in Shenzhen on the day they received their marriage certificate, and the incident quickly sparked discussion. According to the netizen's account, they had called the store in advance to confirm that doing makeup was allowed as long as it did not disturb others, but after making a purchase that day, they were still discouraged by the shift manager during the makeup process and even felt insulted. The store involved responded that if the smell or powder of cosmetics affects other customers, staff will step in to remind them, that the shift manager's voice was indeed somewhat loud at the time, and that afterward the full order was refunded and two tall drink vouchers were given. The regional manager has stepped in to communicate. Netizens have differing views on this. Some believe a coffee shop is not a place for doing makeup, while others think normal touch-ups are harmless and that there may be another reason for the conflict. The incident has once again prompted reflection on the boundaries of using public space in coffee shops. [more…]

Recently, the owner of a popular café in Huzhou was innocently caught up in an online rumor about "an HIV carrier infecting a hundred people," triggering panic across the city. A swift police investigation led to the administrative detention of Shen, the person who fabricated the rumor. This incident serves as another warning: cyberspace is not a lawless realm, and spreading rumors will inevitably bring legal consequences. At the same time, looking back at several rumors surrounding coffee and cafés in recent years—from "Starbucks causes cancer" to the "Jinan café powder-throwing" incident—all remind coffee lovers to stay rational, not believe rumors, and not spread them. As advocates of coffee culture, Front Street Coffee also calls on everyone to jointly maintain a clean online environment, so that every cup of coffee returns to pure enjoyment. [more…]

Well-known yogurt brand Blueglass was fined 400,000 yuan by the Beijing Chaoyang District Market Supervision Administration for an advertisement that carried hints about male function. In May of this year, the brand launched the "Superboy Boyfriend Power Wins a Round" series, adding ingredients such as cistanche, polygonatum, and ginseng, and paired it with advertising slogans such as "I won't sell to anyone under 18," which sparked consumer backlash. Regulators determined that its advertisement was vulgar, bordered on pornography, and violated public order. After the case came to light, the brand removed the related advertisement, but recently reporters found that the ad image still exists in the mini-program, and the product has been renamed "Good Spirit Wins a Round," while the ingredients still include maca, deer penis, and other components. As coffee enthusiasts, we pay attention to the boundaries and compliance issues of brand marketing. [more…]

Coconut Palm Group recently released an advertisement for the eighth intake of its training school for deputy general managers, drawing attention with a maximum annual salary of 480,000 yuan and generous perks such as a car and housing upon enrollment, while also replacing its previous sexy model images with a festive wedding style, sparking heated discussion among netizens. This is not the first time Coconut Palm has found itself in controversy over its advertising—over the years it has persisted in borderline marketing and has been penalized by regulators multiple times, including a 400,000 yuan fine in May this year for using state agency personnel in commercial marketing and for advertising slogans that violate public order and good morals. This article will review the details of this recruitment drive, the changes in advertising style, and Coconut Palm Group's repeated history of marketing violations. [more…]

As the Start of Autumn solar term arrives, the milk tea industry welcomes its annual sales peak, and coffee brands are also swept into this consumer frenzy. Luckin Coffee, due to the addition of its light milk tea product line, has seen order volumes rise significantly compared to the same period in previous years, with some stores forced to adopt flow-limiting measures such as suspending water and ice due to staff shortages. However, under intense work pressure, a Luckin Coffee store in Zhaoqing, Guangdong, experienced a physical altercation between employees. According to the New Express, two employees are suspected to have escalated a verbal dispute into a physical fight, but other colleagues intervened in time, and the incident resulted in no injuries. At present, the store manager has confirmed the matter and reported it to the public relations department. This "first internal strife of autumn" reflects the enormous pressure faced by food and beverage workers during the peak season. [more…]

Recently, at a Starbucks store in Baolong Plaza, Shengzhou, Shaoxing, Zhejiang, the outdoor seating area was occupied for a long time by several elderly people who not only chatted and rested there, but also gathered to play cards and mahjong, creating noise and refusing to give up seats, seriously disrupting the store's normal operations and other customers' experience. After repeated ineffective requests to leave, the staff chose to call the police, who arrived to mediate, and most of the elderly left that day. The mall stated that it had communicated with relevant departments and planned to guide these elderly people to a senior service center to rest. The incident sparked heated discussion online, with most people supporting the store's approach to maintaining order, and lawyers also pointed out that if the elderly make loud noises or play cards affecting others, they may violate the Public Security Administration Punishments Law. As a well-known coffee brand, Starbucks' store order management has once again become a public focus, and Front Street Coffee reminds consumers to enjoy the coffee space civilly. [more…]

Actress and director Jia Ling sued a company in Anhui for unauthorized use of her cartoon boxing image on the packaging of its "Ms. Jia Black Coffee" and implying weight-loss benefits. Recently, the Qiaocheng District Court in Bozhou, Anhui, ruled that the defendant infringed Jia Ling's portrait rights and ordered it to stop producing the infringing product, issue a public apology, and pay 100,000 yuan in compensation for economic losses. The case stemmed from the box-office success of the film YOLO, when some merchants promoted black coffee products under the guise of "Jia Ling's same style," while the film's official team repeatedly clarified that it had never authorized any endorsement of fat-reducing products. This article reviews the course of events and the key points of the ruling, while reminding consumers to view celebrity-endorsed coffee marketing rationally. [more…]

A customer entered an ordinary Starbucks store with a cat carrier to make a purchase. After ordering and sitting down, they were asked to leave by staff, on the grounds that it might disturb other customers. The customer believed the merchant had failed in its duty to inform and that their rights had been harmed; however, most netizens, considering food safety and the feelings of those in public spaces, did not support bringing pets into the store. Behind the incident, Starbucks actually has pet-friendly stores, whose rules differ from those of ordinary stores. So should pets be allowed into coffee shops or not? What should merchants and consumers each pay attention to? This article sorts through the course of the incident and public opinion, and includes relevant advice from Front Street Coffee. [more…]

Recently, several incidents involving middle-aged and elderly people playing phone videos out loud in coffee shops and sparking disputes have drawn attention. From Suzhou, Jiangsu to Hangzhou, Zhejiang, similar scenes have played out repeatedly: elderly individuals turn the video volume up to the maximum, disturbing nearby customers who are working, studying, or chatting; when staff and other patrons step forward to remind them, they are subjected to prolonged verbal abuse and even come close to physical altercations. This phenomenon reflects the conflict between middle-aged and elderly short-video users and the public's need for quiet, and it also puts coffee shops in a dilemma when trying to maintain order. Front Street Coffee reminds us that savoring coffee requires a quiet and comfortable environment; playing audio out loud in a civilized manner not only affects others but also ruins the atmosphere a café should have. [more…]